Political Network for Values
  • ABOUT US
    • WHO WE ARE
    • COUNCIL OF EXPERTS
    • YOUTH PROGRAM
    • ALLIED NETWORKS
  • WHAT WE DO
    • TRANSATLANTIC SUMMIT
    • TRANSATLANTICS WEBINARS
    • ROADMAPS
  • OUR VALUES
  • NEWS
  • CONTACT
  • DONATE
  • |
  • Español
  • English
  • ABOUT US
    • WHO WE ARE
    • COUNCIL OF EXPERTS
    • YOUTH PROGRAM
    • ALLIED NETWORKS
  • WHAT WE DO
    • TRANSATLANTIC SUMMIT
    • TRANSATLANTICS WEBINARS
    • ROADMAPS
  • OUR VALUES
  • NEWS
  • CONTACT
  • DONATE
  • |
  • Español
  • English

17 April 2025  |  By Diego de Jesús Hernández

Legal definition of “woman” is based on biological sex, UK Supreme Court rules

WKWAWI_1

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom recognized Wednesday, April 16, that for legal purposes the term “woman” is determined by biological sex. “The concept of sex is binary, a person is either a woman or a man,” the court ruled.

In announcing the decision, the court’s vice-chairman, Patrick Stewart Hodge, said, “the unanimous decision of this court is that the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological woman and biological sex.” You can read the ruling here.

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s government said it has always supported the protection of “non-mixed spaces based on biological sex” and that the ruling brought “clarity and confidence” around the provision of services in hospitals, domestic violence shelters and sports clubs.

Legally, women will be protected from sharing public or private spaces and services specifically intended for women when men who consider themselves women (“trans women”) seek to use them.

The Court’s ruling directly impacts the interpretation of the Equality Act, passed by the UK Parliament in 2010, which updated numerous anti-discrimination rules and regulations. Within that framework, the Scottish Parliament passed legislation in 2018 with the aim of increasing the proportion of women on the boards of government bodies to 50 percent. As part of that legislation, the government said that so-called “trans women” would be contemplated to achieve such a purpose.

The organization For Women Scotland (pictured above) took the Scottish government to court, arguing that the quotas should be filled only by real women, determined on the basis of biological sex. Progressively, the judicial dispute escalated to the Supreme Court.

On leaving the court, Susan Smith, co-director of the organization, said that the ruling will ensure that “services and spaces for women are for women […] Everyone should be protected by the Equality Act. It’s not about prejudice or bigotry, as some would say, it’s not about hatred towards another community. It’s simply about saying that there are differences, and biology is one of those differences, and we need protections based on that.”

[*]

Previous StoryFrom Spain a film that celebrates life and communicates hope
Next StoryTransatlantic Dialogues to address attacks on free speech

Related Articles

  • WhatsApp Image 2025-04-30 at 16.24.23
    Scientific Cover, Political Core: FIGO’s Role in the Abortion Agenda
  • TD banner En
    Transatlantic Dialogues to address attacks on free speech

Leave your comment Cancel Reply

(will not be shared)

Search

Follow us

Facebook PNfV
Twitter
Youtube PNfV
flickr

Recent Posts

  • Scientific Cover, Political Core: FIGO’s Role in the Abortion Agenda
  • Transatlantic Dialogues to address attacks on free speech
  • Legal definition of “woman” is based on biological sex, UK Supreme Court rules

Logo Political Network For Values

Facebook PNfV
Twitter
Instagram
Youtube PNfV
flickr

Contacta

Lola Velarde
Executive Director [email protected]

Elena Morales
Office Director [email protected]


European Office [email protected]

Information

  • Privacy Policy
  • Newsletter
  • Contact

Dona

Copyright © Political Network for Values · 2025 |